If America Had To Choose Between The Options Of Ukraine Winning After 14 Days Or Losing After Two Years

It would be completely wrong to look at the conflict in Ukraine as some isolated - partial war between Russians and Ukrainians, writes journalist and publicist from Niš Nikola Trifić for Novi Standard - It is actually the bloodiest battle so far of a much bigger and wider war - which is being waged by the collective West led by America against Russia and the East.

That's why the only important thing for America is that the conflict in Ukraine continues, so that Russia would be as exhausted as possible for and before some future, perhaps even decisive battles, whether political, military or economic Of course, Ukraine is only a "scapegoat".

If there is a country and people in the world at this moment that should be sincerely regretted, then it is Ukraine and the Ukrainians This country could and had to do better.

If only there was a little more awareness and a little less illusion and fascination with the West with all the specificities and contradictions of its state and national being, an ideal ground, or an ideal platform for the West to wage the great battle of its "holy war" through it; a war of continuous duration against Russia, the East, Eurasia, but also against the Orthodox world.

Also, the truth says: If America, in recent years, had tried its best to bring about a conflict in Ukraine at any cost, wouldn't it have stopped, or at least slowed down, the decline of its imperial power? - that Russia showed certain weaknesses on the front, which few expected The truth - that Russia will not be a real "competitor" to the West, until it reconstructs its economy and until it makes its society attractive to the average person.

Well, and the truth - that Russia is often in love with the West, completely ignored the amount of hatred the West felt towards her For the Russians, the West was a rival in peacetime, and only an adversary in wartime.

For the West, Russia, both in peace and in war - both with the crown and with the pentacle, was always perceived as an archenemy As far as the bloodshed in Ukraine is concerned, it is clear that America is profiting, at least for now, in the short term.

The very fact that within a year of the conflict, America delivered weapons to Ukraine whose value exceeds the value of weapons - which have ever been delivered - anytime and anywhere, in such a short period of time to one country, speaks volumes It should be said: that only 30% of the money allocated for those weapons is enough to fully repair the consequences of the earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, including the permanent care of the victims.

Roughly, 70% of the value of that weapon is enough for all people in the world whose registered material status is "below the poverty line" to have three meals each by the end of the year The entire amount of that money is enough to finance or subsidize the first employment of the entire world population under the age of 27.

Of course, that money will never go that way For people of imperial consciousness, and especially for an empire in decline, war was often and remains the only safe business.

Unfortunately America is aware that Ukraine cannot win a war against Russia, but it is also aware that a country like Ukraine - a relatively large territory, with 40 million inhabitants, which has already undergone a centuries-old process of westernization, but also of creating additional animosity towards Russia - for itself.

Russia can be an exhausting rival Unlike the sympathizers of the Russian side, who naively believed that the Russian march through Ukraine would be similar to the Russian intervention in Georgia a few years ago, America's assessment from the point of view of its interests was much better.

The reason why the United States did not stand more seriously behind Georgia, or why even the Syrian rebels in their conflict against Moscow and the official Damascus, did not receive even a fraction of the weapons that Ukraine has already received, lies precisely in the American assessment: that the conflict in Ukraine has the potential of a multi-year duration with possible debilitating consequences for the Russian Federation Hypothetically, if America could choose between an option - for Ukraine to win after two weeks of conflict, or to lose after two years, even if that defeat meant the definitive end of Ukraine, America would choose the second option.

America needs an isolated and exhausted Russia, the same China, but also a frightened Europe, even more bent under American curtseys; A Europe that will forget about its sovereignty and, in general, about the possibility of keeping its destiny in its own hands Reuters/Photo illustration Moscow claims that America is behind diversions on the Nord Stream.

The United States carefully planned when and what type of weapons it would forward to Ukraine At the beginning of the conflict, while the Russians were, so to speak, in the suburbs of Kiev, the Ukrainian side received only light anti-armor and anti-aircraft systems, mainly of the "Javelin" and "Stinger" types.

As the conflict progressed, first the "Himars" missile systems arrived, certain armored vehicles, but also a whole range of different air defense systems with a longer range It should be remembered that the most popular (not the best) American air defense system of medium to long range was also provided for Ukraine.

Patriot" - albeit in a slightly older version, with the fact that it will be operational in the Ukrainian forces only in the second part of this year The same applies to the new attractive weapons promised to Ukraine.

The tanks in question are: the British "Challenger", the German "Leopard" and the American "Abrams", and at this moment, it is almost certain that in the coming months Ukraine will also be stronger for one type of aircraft of Western production The first pick is the American "F-16".

And this confirms the thesis that the West, led by America, is trying to ensure a long duration of the conflict in Ukraine The Americans would not finance such a contingent of such weapons, if they did not have their own assessment, but also firm guarantees from the authorities in Kiev - that Ukraine is ready to spend at least the whole of 2023 in conflict with Russia, that is, that conflict can only gain intensity over time.

But at the moment, there is a great logistical chaos in the Ukrainian army No army in the history of warfare (literally none) has used five or six types of tanks during one conflict.

In addition to the Soviet "T-72" and "T-55", a small number of Ukrainian "T-84 Oplot", also created on the Soviet infrastructure, Ukraine will in the foreseeable future count on the three types of Western tanks already mentioned, which have important differences between them, and compared to the Soviet-Ukrainian tanks, they represent a completely different type of machine For the sake of comparison, America, as a world superpower, uses only one type of tank, "Abrams", and that in the number of about 8,000 units.

Back in the early 90s, America gave up a huge number of its "Paton" series tanks and an even larger number of combat machines created on the "Paton" platform, How will Ukrainian tankmen - and there are very few of them left - master the management of the "Leopard" and especially the "Abrams", which is "driven" almost in a lying position? That is: How will Ukraine provide four-man crews for the "Abrams", given that Until now, Ukraine used only tanks with three-man crews? Or: How will Ukrainian pilots - and there are only a few of them left - manage to retrain for the use of the "F-16" aircraft, completely different avionics compared to the fighters that Ukraine has had or still has at its disposal (Su- 27 and MiG-29)? For example, the last two Ukrainian pilots to die when their aircraft were shot down were 51 and 54 In fact, one of the two was a retired fighter pilot in the reserve, while the other was a flight instructor.

However, the answers to these questions are very simple.

There will be very few Ukrainians in the new "killing machines" America, in part also the West, has quite a sufficient number of retired people - mostly young war veterans, officers, pilots, and other professional staff - who, for a good daily wage, would be even more motivated by the fight against Russia , nominally put on a Ukrainian uniform.

We already have such a situation - and such situations are especially expected in the near future Photo illustration It is a red line for Moscow if the USA sends an airplane to Kiev.

, both purchased and donated "migs and suhoys" were flown mostly by "Soviet" retired pilots divided into two armies, while for the local population there was only a cannon or a fight within the range of a machine gun As for the Ukrainians, and regarding the conflict on their land, America has reserved a role for them: infantry, first line of battle and artillery meat.

In general, the further development of the NATO pact and its conquest doctrine put in the track of American imperialism - precisely predicts that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the movie "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of almost bare-handed Red Army soldiers storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like haystacks are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

America has reserved a role for them: infantry, first line of battle and artillery meat In general, the further development of the NATO pact and its conquest doctrine put in the track of American imperialism - precisely predicts that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era.

Scenes from the movie "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of almost bare-handed Red Army soldiers storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like haystacks are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism".

As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian America has reserved a role for them: infantry, first line of battle and artillery meat.

In general, the further development of the NATO pact and its conquest doctrine put in the track of American imperialism - precisely predicts that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the movie "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of almost bare-handed Red Army soldiers storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like haystacks are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

In general, the further development of the NATO pact and its conquest doctrine put in the track of American imperialism - precisely predicts that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the movie "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of almost bare-handed Red Army soldiers storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like haystacks are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

In general, the further development of the NATO pact and its conquest doctrine put in the track of American imperialism - precisely predicts that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the movie "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of almost bare-handed Red Army soldiers storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like haystacks are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

the further development of the NATO pact and its doctrine of conquest placed in the tracks of American imperialism - precisely foresees that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the film "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of of bare-armed Red Army men storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like a bundle of hay are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

the further development of the NATO pact and its doctrine of conquest placed in the tracks of American imperialism - precisely foresees that peoples and states outside the Anglo-Germanic cultural pattern are used exclusively as "light cavalry" of the modern era Scenes from the film "The Enemy at the Door", when hundreds of of bare-armed Red Army men storming well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and being mowed down like a bundle of hay are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

when hundreds of almost bare-armed Red Army men charge at well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and are mowed down like haystacks, they are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism".

As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian when hundreds of almost bare-armed Red Army men charge at well-fortified Nazi machine-gun nests and are mowed down like haystacks, they are mild compared to the role created for the Ukrainians by the war department of Hollywood, that is, America.

It will be a big march and a big rush for the interests of American imperialism and "American exceptionalism" As it has been said many times - to the last Ukrainian.

.